SCOTT D. STRAIN v. MR. BULT’S, INC. ET AL. (TWCA November 29, 2012)
An employee alleged that he sustained an injury to his back. His employer denied the claim. The trial court found the injury to be compensable and awarded the employee 30% permanent partial disability benefits. The employer has appealed contending that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding that the injury is compensable. On appeal, the employee asserts that the award of benefits was inadequate. After review of the record, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/strains_112912.pdf
Showing posts with label compensability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label compensability. Show all posts
Friday, November 30, 2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
TN Supreme Court reviews whether an employee's injuries were compensable based on whether he refused to follow a safety rule
TROY MITCHELL v. FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC UTILITIES (Tenn. May 8, 2012)
The trial court awarded workers’ compensation benefits to an injured lineman who had violated a rule requiring the use of protective gloves while in a bucket lift. The employer appealed, contending that the statutory defenses of willful misconduct and, more particularly, the willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance or device precluded recovery.
The appeal was referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-225(e)(3) (2008). After oral argument before the Panel, but before the Panel filed its opinion, the case was transferred to the full Court.
Because the evidence establishes that the employee admitted his knowledge of a regularly enforced safety rule, understood the rationale for the rule, and willfully (rather than negligently or recklessly) failed to comply, the injuries he suffered because of the rule violation are not compensable. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, reversed and the case is dismissed.
Majority opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/mitchellt_050812.pdf
Justice Holder's dissenting opinion is available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/mitchellt_DIS_050812.pdf
The trial court awarded workers’ compensation benefits to an injured lineman who had violated a rule requiring the use of protective gloves while in a bucket lift. The employer appealed, contending that the statutory defenses of willful misconduct and, more particularly, the willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance or device precluded recovery.
The appeal was referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-225(e)(3) (2008). After oral argument before the Panel, but before the Panel filed its opinion, the case was transferred to the full Court.
Because the evidence establishes that the employee admitted his knowledge of a regularly enforced safety rule, understood the rationale for the rule, and willfully (rather than negligently or recklessly) failed to comply, the injuries he suffered because of the rule violation are not compensable. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, reversed and the case is dismissed.
Majority opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/mitchellt_050812.pdf
Justice Holder's dissenting opinion is available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/mitchellt_DIS_050812.pdf
Monday, March 7, 2011
TWCA Reviews Whether Employee's Neck Injury was Compensable
ROBIN BAKER v. A & L INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE, INC. (TWCA March 7, 2011)
The employee sustained a compensable injury to her left wrist. She alleged that she also sustained a neck injury as a result of the same incident. The employer denied the neck claim. The employee's evaluating physician expressed somewhat contradictory opinions regarding the causal relationship between the work incident and her neck injury. The trial court held that the employee had a compensable neck injury in addition to her wrist injury and awarded benefits accordingly. The employer has appealed that finding. We affirm the judgment.
Opinion available at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/2011/bakerr.pdf
The employee sustained a compensable injury to her left wrist. She alleged that she also sustained a neck injury as a result of the same incident. The employer denied the neck claim. The employee's evaluating physician expressed somewhat contradictory opinions regarding the causal relationship between the work incident and her neck injury. The trial court held that the employee had a compensable neck injury in addition to her wrist injury and awarded benefits accordingly. The employer has appealed that finding. We affirm the judgment.
Opinion available at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/2011/bakerr.pdf
Friday, October 22, 2010
TWCA reviews compensability of injuries employees incurred while traveling from one job site to another
CALVIN D. ERVIN v. JONES BROS., INC., ET AL. (TWCA October 22, 2010)
This consolidated appeal involves two employees who were injured while traveling in a personal vehicle during lunchtime while going from one job site to another. The trial court held that the injuries were compensable and awarded permanent partial disability benefits. The employer has appealed. We affirm the trial court's holding on the issue of compensability. However, we modify the trial court's ruling on the extent of disability.
Opinion may be found at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/2010/ervinc_102210.pdf
This consolidated appeal involves two employees who were injured while traveling in a personal vehicle during lunchtime while going from one job site to another. The trial court held that the injuries were compensable and awarded permanent partial disability benefits. The employer has appealed. We affirm the trial court's holding on the issue of compensability. However, we modify the trial court's ruling on the extent of disability.
Opinion may be found at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/2010/ervinc_102210.pdf
Labels:
compensability,
Permanent Partial Disablity,
travel,
TWCA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)